Hearing on an IA seeking withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's unwillingness to prosecute, disposed of the IA by dismissing the principal writ petition as not pressed.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8981 Of 2020 (Through hybrid mode)
Laxman Nayak
Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Satpathy, Advocate
-versus-
Collector and DM, Mayurbhanj and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. B. K. Mohanty, O.Ps.
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA ORDER
Order No.
4.
02.12.2021 I.A. No.16563 of 2021
1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of private opposite party and submits, his client did not get copy of the application. Since petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition there is no necessity to require service of the application on opposite parties.
2. Mr. Satpathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, I.A. no.16562 of 2021 has been filed with prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
2. The I.A. is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
Laxman Nayak
Collector and DM, Mayurbhanj
others
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
