Fakira Sethi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This bench found the filed writ petition to have become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition and vacated any interim order that might have been in force.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6928 of 2007
Fakira Sethi
…. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Rath, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. D.K. Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
Order No. 24.03.2021
07. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the writ petition
has been rendered infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Fakira Sethi
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
B. P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court