Writ petition challenging non-allotment of industrial land. Court found petitioner occupied a plot sub-linearly, despite it not being officially allotted, without filing rejoinder for eight years. Held, no equity exists to grant relief; petition dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed with a declaration that no interim order exists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
// 1 //
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13507 of 2009
Smt. Nalini Moharana
…. Petitioner Mr. D.B. Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. M.S. Sahoo, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Order No.
ORDER 24.03.2021
Page 1 of 2
S.K. Jena/P.A.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to allotment of land despite unauthorized occupation of a plot not yet allotted to her.
Whether the petitioner has any equity to obtain the relief prayed for.
Smt. Nalini Moharana
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
