Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Utkal Asbestos Ltd. Vs A.C. of Sales Tax — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Utkal Asbestos Ltd. Vs A.C. of Sales TaxUtkal Asbestos Ltd. v. A.C. of Sales Tax

Disposed

Utkal Asbestos Ltd. v. A.C. of Sales Tax

Orissa HC3 Nov 2021WP(C)/5414/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner stated that the writ petition became infructuous due to a common order in another related writ petition filed that day.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Utkal Asbestos Ltd. v. A.C. of Sales Tax, WP(C)/5414/2004 (OD), decided on 3 November 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.P. Routray

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous because a common order was passed on the same day in another related writ petition (W.P.(C). No.9984 of 2004). No substantive legal proposition is discussed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.5414 of 2004

M/s Utkal Asbestos Ltd. …. Petitioner Mr. N. Paikray, Advocate -versus…. The Asst. Commissioner of Sales Opposite Parties Tax (Assessment), Cuttack-II Range and another

Mr. S.S. Padhy, A.S.C.

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY

ORDER 03.11.2021

Order No.

It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner that in view of common order passed today in W.P.(C) No.9984 of 2004, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray ) Judge

S.K. Guin

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s Utkal Asbestos Ltd.
respondent
The Asst. Commissioner of Sales Opposite Parties Tax (Assessment), Cuttack-II Range

Coram

AI extract

B.P. Routray

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 3 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 11 May 2004
Case no.: WP(C)/5414/2004
CNR: ODHC010009712004
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray
Disposal: Disposed Off

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Dhiren Sahoo Vs State and Ors.
2 Nov 2021
Krushna Ch.Nayak Vs State
2 Nov 2021
Santosh Ku.Pradhan Vs State
2 Nov 2021
Utkal Asbestos Ltd. Vs a.C.of Sales Tax
3 Nov 2021
Utkal Asbestos Ltd. Vs a.C.of Sales Tax
3 Nov 2021
Sunita Goenka Vs Mcl, Sambalpur
3 Nov 2021