Dhiren Sahoo v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition by Dhiren Sahoo was dismissed for nonprosecution due to lack of instructions from his counsel. The order contains no substantive legal discussion.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21052 of 2012
Dhiren Sahoo
…. Petitioner Mr. D. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 02.11.2021 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. 2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray ) Judge
Order No.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dhiren Sahoo
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
B.P. Routray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court