The High Court of Odisha disposed of a writ petition challenging an order refusing to refer a matter to Lok Adalat. The writ was held infructuous because the underlying suit had been settled and withdrawn by the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4767 of 2012
D.Rajendra Kumar Bindhanira and …. Petitioners another
Mr.Suvendu Kar, Advocate
-versus-
…. State Bank of India, Bellaguntha Opp. Party Branch, Bhanjanagar
Mr.P.V.Balkrishan, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
05.08.2021
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition maintained in the face of settlement and withdrawal of the suit.
D.Rajendra Kumar Bindhanira
State Bank of India, Bellaguntha Opp. Party Branch, Bhanjanagar
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
