Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ramesh Ch.Sethy Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Ramesh Ch.Sethy Vs StateRamesh Ch.Sethy v. State

Dismissed

Ramesh Ch.Sethy v. State

Orissa HC1 Nov 2021WP(C)/4255/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought no instructions. Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution without allowing merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.4255 of 2009

Ramesh Chandra Sethy and another

…. Petitioners

Mr. T.K. Mandal, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa and another

…. Opposite Parties

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY

Order No.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ramesh Chandra Sethy
petitioner
another
respondent
State of Orissa
respondent
another

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 1 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 18 Mar 2009
Case no.: WP(C)/4255/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

M/S.Manorama Enginee Vs Asst.Commnr.of Cent
30 Oct 2021
Emtaz Hussain Vs Union of India
30 Oct 2021
Abhaya Pradhan Mohapatra Vs Union of India
30 Oct 2021
Madhu Parida Vs Rdc,Cuttack
1 Nov 2021

Cite this judgement

Ramesh Ch.Sethy v. State, WP(C)/4255/2009 (OD), decided on 1 November 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Dr. S. Muralidhar and B.P. Routray and S.K. Guin

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution as the counsel stated to have no instructions from the petitioner. No substantive examination of legal grounds was held.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

ORDER 01.11.2021

Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that he has no instructions in the matter.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice ( B.P. Routray ) Judge

S.K. Guin

Dr. S. Muralidhar
B.P. Routray
S.K. Guin

CNR

ODHC010013842009

Topic

Constitutional and Fundamental Rights

Bench

S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Disposal

Disposed Off

Bhabagrahi Behera Vs State and Ors.

1 Nov 2021

Puspalata Mohanty Vs State and Ors.

1 Nov 2021