Dismissed
Rohit Ku.Sharma v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/410/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition undersigned N.C.Roc as infructuous since the tender period had concluded over ten years prior; the petitioner was absent, and the State counsel advocated accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.410 of 2010
¶3
Rohit Kumar Sharma
¶4
…. Petitioner Mr. Prashanta Ku.Nayak , Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
State of Odisha
¶7
…. Opposite Party
¶8
Smt. Suman Pattnaik, Addl. Government Advocate
¶9
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K.MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 14.7.2021.
¶10
Order No.
¶12
- This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rohit Kumar Sharma
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
S.K. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court