This single-judge High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for a new power supply connection within two months.
Direction to the opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the petitioner's representation for a new power connection within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 38367 of 2020
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.1 to take adequate step for disposal of Annexure-1, i.e., the representation dated 22.12.2020 for new connection of power supply to her residence.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-1, and direction be given to the said opposite party to consider and dispose of the same.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-1 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified/ authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner.
As COVID-19 pandemic situation is continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
GDS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite party is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation for a new power connection?
Petitioner
Opposite Party No. 1
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
