Disposed
Gobardhan Prasad Dalai v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/3567/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C).…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.3567 2020
Gobardhan Prasad Dalai ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Mohanty(A), Advocate - VersusState of Odisha & Others ….. Opposite parties Mr.S.P.Panda, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
09.07.2021
Order No.
02
1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The matter involves so many developments involving the eviction of illegal encroachers. From document at page-30 of the brief, an information dated 12.08.2011 it is noticed that that there has been already initiation of steps for eviction, but those are all taken place in the year, 2011. Sri Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner complains in spite of all these developments, there is in fact no eviction as of now. On the self same issue, it appears, petitioner has already ventilated his grievance in the Grievance Cell of Collector & District Magistrate, Balasore appearing to be pending since 25.11.2014. There is also appearing involvement of some Civil Suit as per Annexure-7/A. This Court finds surprise in pendency of such issue for such long period. 4. It is considering the background involved herein and since a grievance petition of the petitioner dated
25.11.2019 appearing at page 37 of the brief on the self same issue is pending in the Grievance Cell of the Collector, Balasore, in the event such issue is pending consideration of the Collector, decision, as appropriate, be taken on the same taking into account the development through the writ petition involved herein, the information of the Tahasildar appearing at page-30 and the development through the Civil Suit at Annexure-7/A by completing the entire exercise within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order by the petitioner with opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the persons likely to be affected. 5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(BISWANATH RATH) JUDGE
sks
Gobardhan Prasad Dalai
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court