Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rena@Runu Nayak Vs Namita Nayak — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Rena@Runu Nayak Vs Namita NayakRena@Runu Nayak v. Namita Nayak

Dismissed

Rena@Runu Nayak v. Namita Nayak

Orissa HC9 Nov 2021WP(C)/3156/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition without hearing, as counsel for the petitioners filed a withdrawal of the suit.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.3156 Of 2013 (Through hybrid mode)

Rena @ Runu Nayak & others

…. Petitioners

Mr. B.K. Behera, Advocate

-versus-

Mamita Nayak & others

…. Opposite Parties

Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, Addl. Govt. Advocate Mr. P.K. Mahali, Advocate for O.P.3

CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

Order No.

ORDER 09.11.2021

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Rena @ Runu Nayak & others
respondent
Mamita Nayak & others

Coram

AI extract

Arindam Sinha

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 9 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 8 Feb 2013
Case no.: WP(C)/3156/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Arindam Sinha

State of Odisha Vs Radhakanta Tripathy
8 Nov 2021
Sudam Tandi Vs State of Odisha
8 Nov 2021
Ajaya Kumar Mohanty Vs State of Odisha
8 Nov 2021
Md. Qaisar Iqbal Ali Vs State of Odisha
9 Nov 2021

Cite this judgement

Rena@Runu Nayak v. Namita Nayak, WP(C)/3156/2013 (OD), decided on 9 November 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Arindam Sinha

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed by this Court on the submission that it was not to be pressed by the counsel appearing for the petitioners. No substantive legal proposition is laid down.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

04. 1. Mr. Behera, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, he has instruction from his client that the writ petition is not to be pressed.

2. Opposite party no.3 is represented by Mr. Mahali, learned advocate.

3. The writ petition is dismissed.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge

Sks

Page 1 of 1

CNR

ODHC010013252013

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Disposal

Withdrawn

Raghunatha Palei Vs Principal Secy. Govt.of Odisha

9 Nov 2021

Dr.Panchanan Sahoo Vs Subhashree Sahoo

9 Nov 2021