The High Court of Orissa, on the submission of the petitioner, that he has decided not to press the writ petition further, dismissed the same as good sense prevailed on the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No.782 of 2001 (Through hybrid mode)
Ajaya Kumar Mohanty
…. Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Panigrahi, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
08.11.2021
Order No.
4. 1. Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner. He submits, he has instruction from his client to not further press the writ petition. Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate, Addl. Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Ajaya Kumar Mohanty
State of Odisha
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
