A writ petition seeking direction to absorb petitioners as Sikshya Sahayaks and treat them as Junior Teachers or Regular Primary School Teachers from specific past dates based on service continuity and government policy.
Direction to respondent to dispose of the petitioners' representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.30975 OF 2021
Duryodhan Mohanta & Ors.
Petitioners
Mr. K. Swain, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors.
….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 08.10.2021 Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 1 2. Heard Mr. K. Swain, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Charan Dey Vrs. State of Orissa and others , 2020 (II) ILRCut-84 , which has been upheld in W.A. No. 10 of 2021 disposed of on 02.02.2021.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are liable to be absorbed as Sikshya Sahayaks and treated as Junior Teachers/Primary School Teachers based on continuity of service and government ratios.
Whether the representation filed by the petitioners regarding absorption into the service requires direction to be disposed of within a stipulated time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dhananjay Charan Dey vs. State of Orissa and othersDistinguished¶3
Dhananjay Charan Dey Vrs. State of Orissa and others, 2020 (II) ILRCut-84
Duryodhan Mohanta & Ors.
State of Odisha & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
