The High Court of Orissa, without expressing an opinion on the merits, disposed of the petitioner's writ petition urging opposite parties to consider his representation and issue an appropriate order within three months.
The opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation and pass an appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 29997 of 2021
Manoranjan Pradhan
….
Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Panda, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others ….
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
08.10.2021
Order No.
01
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Ashok
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to sanctions and release of family pension by opposite parties.
Manoranjan Pradhan
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
