Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Raghunath Agarwala Vs S.T.O.,Cuttack-I — Orissa HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Raghunath Agarwala Vs S.T.O.,Cuttack-IRaghunath Agarwala v. S.T.O.,Cuttack-I

Disposed

Raghunath Agarwala v. S.T.O.,Cuttack-I

Orissa HC17 Nov 2021WP(C)/2843/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was held infructuous due to the passage of time and was disposed of without any operative relief.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.2843 of 2010

M/s. Raghunath Agarwala

…. Petitioner Mr. N. Paikaray, Advocate

-versus-

…. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-1 West Opp. Parties Circle, Cuttack & others

Mr. S. S. Padhy Additional Standing Counsel (CT & GST)

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

17.11.2021

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s. Raghunath Agarwala
respondent
Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack

Coram

AI extract

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 17 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 10 Feb 2010
Case no.: WP(C)/2843/2010

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Sadhu Oram Vs State of Orissa
16 Nov 2021
Uttar Parswa Vs State
16 Nov 2021
M/S.Ostapal Chromite Vs Union of India
16 Nov 2021
Bhushan Power and Vs State
17 Nov 2021

Cite this judgement

Raghunath Agarwala v. S.T.O.,Cuttack-I, WP(C)/2843/2010 (OD), decided on 17 November 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and A.K. Mohapatra

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was held infructuous due to the passage of time and was disposed of without any operative relief.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that with passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous.

It is disposed of as such.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge

R.K. Singh/Jagabandhu

A.K. Mohapatra

CNR

ODHC010004642010

Bench

S. Muralidhar CJ Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Disposal

Disposed Off

Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs Joint Comnr.I.Tax

17 Nov 2021

M/S.Idl Industries Vs Commnr.of Sales Tax

17 Nov 2021