The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.3 to consider and decide on the petitioner's representation concerning regularization of service within three months.
Direct opposite party no.3 to dispose of petitioner's representation on regularization of service within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 2619 of 2021
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party no.3 to dispose of the representation within a stipulated period in view of Annexure-5 regarding regularization of service.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation before opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-5 and direction be given to the said opposite party to consider and dispose of the same.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.3 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified/ authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner.
As COVID-19 pandemic situation is continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s official website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
…………….…………… (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite party should be directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding regularization of service within a stipulated period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Opposite Party No.3
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
