The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed solely due to non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear. No substantive issues were adjudicated other than the procedural abandonment of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.25951 of 2014
Harihara Mahanta …. Petitioner None -versus- Tahasildar, Sukinda and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
18.11.2021
Order No.
06. 1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(A. K. Mohapatra )
Judge
M. Panda
Harihara Mahanta
Tahasildar, Sukinda and others
Justice A. K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
