Remanded

Yudhisthir Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC24 Aug 2021WP(C)/24241/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Oriasa, relying on recent precedents including the Apex Court decision in SLP (C) No.15573 of 2020 and a prior Writ Petition, set aside an order denying benefits. The Court remitted the matter to the respondents to consider the petitioner's case under the settled legal position, awarding arrear if favorable.

What did the court decide?

Set aside impugned order; remitted matter to Opposite Parties No.1 & 3 to consider petitioner's case under settled law within six weeks.

Yudhisthir Pradhan Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.24241 of 2021

¶3

Yudhisthir Pradhan

¶4

…. Petitioner Mr. A.K. Pandy, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

….
State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Parties
Mr. B. Mohanty,
Standing Counsel for
the S. & M.E. Department
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
24.08.2021

¶7

Order No.

¶8

1 . 1. Undisputed fact remains, being aggrieved with the order dated 9.10.2018 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No.1668 of 2017 involving similar nature of disputes, the State had moved the Writ Petition bearing No.6698 of 2020 to this Court, which appears to have been disposed of on contest by the Division Bench on 13.03.2020. Pursuant to which, it appears, the State also moved a petition bearing SLP (C) No.15573 of 2020 before the Hon’ble apex Court. This SLP has also been dismissed on 4.01.2021, thereby confirming the view taken by the Tribunal in O.A. No.1668 of 2017.

¶9

Page 1 of 2

¶10

// 2 //

¶11

2. There is also no dispute that similar nature of dispute has also been decided by this Court in W.P.(C) No.16032 of 2021, where this Court has already recorded regarding withdrawal of the circular taking away the benefit already granted in favour of the similarly situated persons. Considering that similar nature of dispute has already been decided in the meantime and further taking into consideration that similar benefit has already been extended to the similarly situated persons by issuing letter bearing No.8367 dated 13.04.2021, this Court while setting aside the impugned order, remits the matter to the Opposite Party Nos.1 & 3 to consider the case of the Petitioner examining application of the settled position through O.A. No.1668 of 2017, W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020, W.P.(C) No.439 of 2020 and SLP (C) No.15573 of 2020. In the event the Petitioner’s case is considered favorably, then he shall also be entitled to arrear on account of the same, if any.

¶12

3. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order along with copy of the orders passed in O.A. No.1668 of 2017, W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020, W.P.(C) No.439 of 2020 and SLP (C) No.15573 of 2020, by the Petitioner.

¶13

4. With the aforesaid direction the writ petition stands disposed

¶14

¶15

(Biswanath Rath)

¶16

Judge

¶17

A.K. Jena

¶18

Page 2 of 2

Yudhisthir Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yudhisthir Pradhan v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saroj Ku Panda Vs State of Orissa

Sailabala Kund Vs Chithra Arumugan

Magania Mahakul Vs G.v.v.Sharma

U.I.I.Co.Ltd. Vs Prafulla Kr. Mohanty

U.I.I.Co.Ltd. Vs Laxmidhar Routray

Jitanjali Das@Behera Vs Karunakar Behera