Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Raju Bag Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2021)

Home
Orissa HC
2021
Raju Bag Vs StateRaju Bag v. State

Dismissed

Raju Bag v. State

Orissa HC29 Nov 2021WP(C)/22382/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's non-appearance in High Court of Orissa.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on account of non-appearance.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.22382 of 2014

Raju Bag and Others

…. Petitioners

None is present

-versus-

State of Odisha and Others

…. Opp. Parties

Mr. S.N. Das, Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

Order No.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Raju Bag and Others
respondent
State of Odisha and Others

Coram

AI extract

The Chief Justice

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 29 Nov 2021 · November
Registered: 17 Nov 2014
Case no.: WP(C)/22382/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Mahendra Bhoi Vs State of Orissa
23 Nov 2021
The Chief Secretary to Govt.of Odisha Vs Ashok Kumar Tripathy
23 Nov 2021
Anjan Kumar Sahoo Vs the Registrar, Cat Cuttack Bench
23 Nov 2021
Mrutyunjaya Sahoo Vs State of Odisha
29 Nov 2021

Cite this judgement

Raju Bag v. State, WP(C)/22382/2014 (OD), decided on 29 November 2021.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

The Chief Justice and Justice B. P. Routray

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on account of non-appearance.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was dismissed for default by the cause list instruction that case will be dismissed if petitioner does not appear for proper hearing on the said date. All cases were heard in chambers. Today the case was disposed off by ordering that it shall be treated as dismissed for non-prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

ORDER
29.11.2021

None appears on call for the Petitioner.

The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
( B.P. Routray)
Judge

M.K. Panda

Justice B. P. Routray

CNR

ODHC010006562014

Topic

Constitutional and Fundamental Rights

Bench

S. Muralidhar CJ B. P. Routray

Disposal

Dismissed For Default/Non-Prosecution

Paresh Kuanr Vs State and Ors.

29 Nov 2021

Gangadhar Meher Vs Binodini Chhataria

29 Nov 2021