The High Court of Orrissa dismissed the writ appeal as not maintainable, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji v. State of Gujarat.
The writ appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.573 of 2011
…. Angadhar Mehar Appellant Mr. Soumya Mishra, Advocate -versus- Binodini Chhataria and Others …. Respondents None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
Order No. 29.11.2021
02. In view of the judgment in Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji v. State of
Gujarat (2015) 9 SCC 1 , the present writ appeal is not
maintainable and is dismissed as such.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(B.P. Routray)
Judge
S.K. Jena/P.A.
S.K. Jena/P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ appeal is maintainable in light of the judgment in Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji v. State of Gujarat.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji v. State of GujaratRelied on¶5
Jogendrasinhgji Vikaysinhji v. State of Gujarat (2015) 9 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Angadhar Mehar
Binodini Chhataria
B.P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
