Petitioner challenged non-approval of projects in an annual action plan under Gopabandhu Gramin Yojana for FY 2015-16. The court held the writ petition was infructuous due to lapse of time and dismissed it without any substantive ruling on the merits.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous due to lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.21350 of 2016
Trailokya Rout ……. Petitioner
Mr. Sarbeswar Prusty, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others ……. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE C.R. DASH
ORDER
02.09.2021
Order No.
05.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. None appears for the petitioner, when the matter is called
today.
Government of Odisha in Panchayati Raj Department dated 31.08.2015 vide Annexure-1 was not approved by the District Level Committee and the projects, which are approved by the said District Level Committee vide Annexure-4 at Sl. No.61 for implementation was not within the scope of the decision of the aforesaid action plan of the Grama Sabha.
Subha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking approval/declaration regarding Gopabandhu Gramin Yojana project for the year 2015-16 was maintainable.
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding non-approval of projects by District Level Committee was still a live issue at the time of hearing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Trailokya Rout
State of Odisha
C.R. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
