The High Court disposed of the writ petition without adjudication, permitting the petitioner to re-approach the court depending on the outcome of a similar pending appeal. Restrictions due to COVID-19 were noted.
Petitioner permitted to re-approach the court dependent on the outcome of W.A.No.324 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.19559 OF 2021
Upendra Prasad Roul
Petitioner
Mr.Sidhartha Swain, Advocate
- Versus-
State of Odisha & Others ….. Opposite parties Miss.Samapika Mishra, Addl Government Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
13.07.2021
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through video conferencing.
02
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner
prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
(BISWANATH RATH) JUDGE
sks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of unadjudicated while awaiting the outcome of a similar pending matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.A.No.324 of 2020Referred¶3
Upendra Prasad Roul
State of Odisha
BISWANATH RATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
