The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a resumption order by the Collector. It held that an alternate remedy via appeal under the Orissa Government Land Settlement Act, 1962, was available and disposed of the matter without examining the merits.
The writ petition was dismissed and the petitioner was directed to approach the appellate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No. 18064 of 2009
( Dr. S. Muralidhar ) Chief Justice
A.Dash
( K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the resumption order should be quashed given the availability of alternate remedy.
Whether the impugned order should be dismissed in favor of the statutory appeal remedy.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State-Opposite Parties
Dr. S. Muralidhar
A. Dash
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
