Dissenting judge in High Court refused to interfere with District Forum's order refusing interim relief in a writ petition against consumer forum, directing first appeal's disposal with hearing.
Government directed to dispose of pending First Appeal No.590 of 2008 within two months after hearing; High Court denied immediate interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12405 of 2008
Sudhanshu Sekhar Prusty …. Petitioner
Mr.S.N.Mishra-1, Advocate
-versus-
Nari Mallik.
…. Opposite Party
Mr. Rama Chandra Ray, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER 28.10.2021
Order No.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
sks
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum's refusal to pass interim order in a consumer complaint context.
Sudhanshu Sekhar Prusty
Nari Mallik
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
