This order dismisses a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was not present and counsel showed no interest. The matter, pending since 2001, was disposed of on 27.10.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
O.J.C. No.5907 of 2001
Sri Lalita Mohan Chand …. Petitioner
Mr. M. Chand, Advocate for petitioner
-versus-
…. Director, Department of General Opposite Parties Administration Department, Odisha and others.
Mr. S.P. Panda,
Addl. Govt. Advocate for OPs.1 and 2
Mr. D.Mohapatra, Advocate for OP.3
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH ORDER
Order No.
27.10.2021
15 . 1. Nobody is present for the petitioner at the time of call. The matter is pending since 2001. As it appears, learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
2 . Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
U.K.Sahoo
Page 1 of 1
Sri Lalita Mohan Chand
Director, Department of General Opposite Parties Administration Department, Odisha and others
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
