Belimani Sahu Vs State of Odisha

W.P.(C) No. 12065 of 2021

02 23.06.2021

The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to sanction and disburse her entitlement as prayed for in Annexure-4 within a stipulated period.

¶5

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time.

¶6

Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of authenticated/certified copy this order.

¶7

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25^th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15^th April, 2021.

¶8

DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.

¶9

…………….……………

¶10

Alok

Belimani Sahu v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Belimani Sahu v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Trilochan Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Raj Kishore Das Vs Ranjana Chopra, IAS

Bibhuti Bhusan Pan Vs Anu Garg, IAS

Rinku Chetty Vs State of Odisha

Gitanjali Barik Vs State of Odisha

Bhabani Sankar Pandit Vs State of Odisha