The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ appeal challenging the Single Judge's dismissal of a writ petition regarding a land dispute from 1994. The appellate court rejected the claim for indulgence due to significant delay, upholding the lower court's order.
The writ appeal was dismissed with no further grounds for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No.243 of 2008
Jadumani Mishra …. Appellant
Mr. Sukanta Kumar Nayak (2), Advocate -versus-
…. Durgamadhab Rath and Others Respondents None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 06.12.2021
Page 1 of 2
S.K. Jena/P.A.
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the appeal due to the extended delay in filing statutory remedies regarding a dispute dating back to 1994 without granting indulgence.
Whether the circumstances of the second round of litigation warranted interference with the Single Judge's order dismissing the writ petition.
Jadumani Mishra
Durgamadhab Rath
Justice A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
