This order allowed the writ appeal and set aside a Single Judge order that denied a hearing opportunity on merits to the State Appellants. The matter was restored to the file of the Single Judge for hearing with time granted for filing counter affidavits.
Impugned order set aside; matter restored to Single Judge for hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W. A. No.2 of 2020
State of Odisha and another
…. Appellants
Mr. M. K. Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate -versus…. Rudra Narayan Tarei (since dead) Respondents represented by his LRs. and others Mr. Mihir Kumar Dash, Advocate for Respondents 1(a) to 1(c)
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER 06.12.2021
Order No.
Parida v. State of Odisha, 2015 (II) ILR CUT-94.
Page 1 of 2
rejoinder by 10th January, 2022 and not seek any further time for that purpose. The learned Single Judge is requested to endeavour to dispose of the writ petition within a period of four months thereafter.
M. Panda
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(A. K. Mohapatra)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned Single Judge order denying hearing opportunity on merits to cotemporally affected Appellants is sustainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of OdishaExplained¶1
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha, 2015 (II) ILR CUT-94 · Who else cites this
State of Odisha
Rudra Narayan Tarei
A. K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
