A request filed under RPFAM was dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner indicated during the video conference hearing that he no longer wished to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.69 of 2020
…. Petitioner
Krushna Mohan Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Advocate. - versus - Anushree Nayak & Another …. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
ORDER
Order No.
26.08.2021
2. This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing
Mode.
During course of hearing, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he does not want to press this
application and wants to withdraw the same.
Considering such submission, the RPFAM is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Biswajit Mohanty)
Judge
amit
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
Krushna Mohan Nayak
Anushree Nayak
Biswajit Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
