Revenue Authority that there has been no visit to the village involved herein to find out reason of such sale. It is, in this background of the matter, this Court finds, the sale intention clearly discloses that there was requirement of money for the marriage of the daughter and undisputedly such money being received must have been utilized for the purpose indicated in the application seeking permission, prior to stay order. From the order vide Annexure-2 it appears, the Petitioner is in possession of the disputed property till date and for the sale transaction having been declared illegal on technical ground, this Court is of the opinion that taking out the sale transaction will not take out the entire portion. For the finding of the competent authority that there is no local visit to ascertain the intention behind such transaction and since on receipt of sale price there has been delivery of possession in favour of the husband of the Petitioner and further since the permission was sought for to utilize the money for the marriage expenditure of the daughter of the vendor and further since the sale involves a small patch of land out of the whole land measuring Ac.12.00 and looking to the grounds stated in the letter asking permission of the competent authority, this Court while approving the impugned order so far it relates to declaring the sale transaction illegal, but however, sets aside the portion relating to arrangement for return of the disputed land in favour of the vendor and remits the matter to the competent authority to take decision afresh on the request of the vendor of the Petitioner for sale of the land in question, but however, keeping in view the observation of this Court made hereinabove and the development taken place in the meantime. It is further directed that till conclusion of the matter status quo in respect of the disputed property in question shall be maintained.
