Sabita Das v. Malati Rout
Case brief
What is this about?
22.02.2021 Since on earlier occasions, i.e.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P. No.51 of 2008
Since on earlier occasions, i.e. on 20.01.2021, 27.01.2021 and 04.02.2021 no one had joined on behalf of the petitioner through V.C., this Court directed to list this matter today under the caption “Dismissal for NonProsecution”, so that the petitioner or her counsel can take proper notice of the same. But, today also, when this matter is called, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
From the aforesaid, this Court feels that the petitioner is a recalcitrant litigant and not interested to pursue the present litigation.
Accordingly, this civil revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order dated 22.01.2009 passed by this Court in Misc. Case No.91 of 2008 stands vacated.
This order be communicated to the court concerned forthwith.
……..……...…
S.Pujahari, J.
DA
Petitioner
Respondent
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court