The court disposed of a CRLMP by directing the Superintendent of Police, Angul, to decide on a grievance petition regarding non-registration of an FIR within four weeks.
Direction to Superintendent of Police, Angul to decide on the grievance petition within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLMP No.172 of 2021
According to Mr. Mohapatra, grievance of the petitioner in this case pertains to non-registration of his complaint dated 18.01.2021 under Annexure-1 as F.I.R. by the I.I.C., Chhendipada Police Station (opposite party no.5) though the same reveals commission of cognizable offences. He further submits that though against such inaction, the petitioner has approached the Superintendent of Police, Angul (opposite party no.3) by filing a grievance petition dated 21.01.2021 under Annexure-2 sent through Registered Post, however, till date no decision has been taken on the same. In such background, he prays that necessary direction be given to opposite party no.3 to take a decision on his grievance petition within a specific time period.
Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Superintendent of Police, Angul (opposite party no.3) to take a decision on the grievance petition under Annexure-2 in accordance with law keeping in mind the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in
AIR 2014 SC 187 within a period of four weeks from the date of production of copy of this order, if in the meantime the same has not been disposed of. The petitioner is
directed to supply copies of the complaint petition under Annexure-1 and the grievance petition under Annexure-2 to opposite party no.3 while presenting a copy of this order. The petitioner be communicated with the result of such exercise.
The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of.
Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s Website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
……………………………. Biswajit Mohanty, J.
RJ
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U.P. & OthersReferred¶4
Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in AIR 2014 SC 187 · Who else cites this
S.K. Pradhan
Superintendent of Police, Angul
Biswajit Mohanty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
