The High Court directed the petitioner, instead of quashing the impugned order, to file a criminal revision before the Court of Sessions within fifteen days while leaving revisional jurisdiction intact.
Petitioner directed to approach the Court of Sessions in criminal revision within fifteen days; current CRLMC dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.975 of 2020
Manaswini Prusty
Petitioner
-versus-
…. State of Odisha
Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
09.09.2021
4 . But, considering the fact that approaching the Sessions Judge is more convenient and result in expeditious disposal of such petition, this Court directs the Petitioner to approach the Court of Sessions in criminal revision against the impugned order within fifteen days hence and on filing of such revision, if it is
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
otherwise not defective, learned Sessions Judge concerned shall dispose of the same on its own merit within fifteen days thereafter.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
PKS
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash an order of cognizance in a criminal complaint and issue directions for alternate remedy.
Whether lack of delay in approaching the Supreme Court constitutes waiver of revisional jurisdiction before the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manaswini Prusty
State of Odisha
S. PUJARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
