The High Court rejected the petitioner's plea to quash proceedings on N.D.P.S. Act violations at this stage due to custody delays and directed the trial court to conclude the case within six months.
Directs the trial court to try and dispose of the case expeditiously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 907 of 2021
Juel Senapati @ Jayal Senapati
….
Petitioner
Mr. J.K. Panda, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel.
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
17.11.2021
Order No.
2.
Page 1 of 1
and dispose of the case, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can set aside the proceedings due to non-compliance of mandatory provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act regarding search and seizure.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Juel Senapati @ Jayal Senapati
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
