Sasmita Naik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What did the court decide?
Prayer for extension of time to surrender allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.365 of 2020
Sasmita Naik …. Petitioner
Mr. S.K.Baral,
Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr.P. Tripathy,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
30.3.2022.
Order No.
I.A. No.504 of 2022
04. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
5. The I.A. is disposed of.
(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge
Page 2 of 2
Sasmita Naik
State of Odisha
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court