Petitioner challenged charges requiring proof of marriage. Court held that marital relationship and existence of a child are matters to be proved during regular trial. Thus, findings of impugned order stand affirmed without interference.
Civil revisional petition dismissed without any interference in impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 370 of 2021
N. Tirupati Patra
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. Das, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Parties
Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
24.11.2021
Order No.
02.
Page 1 of 2
case, these are the matters which can be gone into during framing of charge by the trial Court.
A.K. Rana
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether charges framed under Sections 498-A/494/506 IPC and Section 4 of D.P. Act can be quashed in absence of material proving marital relationship during trial stage.
N. Tirupati Patra
State of Odisha & Anr.
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
