The High Court of Orissa quashed criminal proceedings in a case arising from a sand quarry boundary dispute. The matter had been settled amicably with the informant's no objection, deeming further criminal proceedings futile.
Criminal proceedings in C.T. Case No.460 of 2018 arising out of Jajpur Sadar P.S. Case No.91 of 2018 are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 341 of 2021
Malaya Prusty and others
….
Petitioners
Mr. B.N. Panda, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Another ….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel Mr. P.C. Sejpada, Advocae (for O.P. No.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
24.11.2021
Order No. 05.
Page 1 of 3
five years as per agreement. On 12.05.2018 at about 5 p.m., the petitioners along with fifty other persons entered into his sand quarry and abused the operator of his Koelco220 machine in filthy language and took away the machine, the operator and cash of Rs.47,500/-, detained him at Bidyadharpur village and threatened to kill them.
Page 2 of 3
proper application.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings initiated following a boundary dispute and settled amicably can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malaya Prusty and others
State of Odisha
Babaji Kabi
Sashikanta Mishra
A.K. Rana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
