Jogendra Bhujabal filed a money compensation application challenging an order of cognizance. The single judge held that the grounds could be raised before the trial court and disposed of the matter, declining interference.
Application for money compensation dismissed as no interference is warranted at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 309 of 2021
Jogendra Bhujabal … Petitioner
Mr. S.S.K. Subudhi, Advocate
State of Odisha (Vigilance)
… Opposite Party
Mr. N. Maharana, Addl. Standing Counsel (Vigilance)
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
14.12.2021
Order No.
3.
A.K. Rana
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of the trial court in a money compensation matter.
Whether the grounds urged by the petitioner against the order of cognizance can be raised before the High Court at this stage.
Jogendra Bhujabal
State of Odisha (Vigilance)
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
