Petitioner sought to quash an order directing further investigation after a final report was filed. Court relied on precedent to uphold the lower court power to direct investigation without court prayer. Petitioner application dismissed.
Cancellation of order staying proceedings. Deemed that quashing application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2095 of 2014
Sanjay Kumar Sahu
…. Petitioner
versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
27.08.2021
counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
such, allowing the I.O. to investigate into the matter further without accepting the Final Form is illegal and liable to be quashed.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further investigation permitted under Section 173(8) of Cr.P.C. without court permission is illegal after final report is accepted.
Whether power to accept final report and direct further investigation belongs to court or relies only on parties prayer.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Abhinandan Jha and others v. Dinesh MishraRelied on¶8
AIR 1968 SC 117 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kumar Sahu
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
