This is an application to restore a CRLMC dismissed for non-prosecution where defects were not removed. The Court denied restoration and granted liberty to file a fresh petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. disjointly disposed.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.; original appeal not restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMA No.66 of 2020
Soumendra Kumar Dash & others
…. Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & another Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER 26.08.2021
(S. Pujahari) Judge
RKS
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal is liable to be restored after it was dismissed for non-prosecution due to unremoved defects?
What relief is granted to the petitioner given the defects remained unremoved after filing?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Soumendra Kumar Dash & others
State of Odisha & another
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
