The petitioner challenged an order of cognizance. The court held that such grounds are to be raised before the court below at the appropriate stage. It declined to interfere and disposed of the CRLMC maintaining the respondent can decide the matter later.
The CRLMC was disposed of; no interference with the order of cognizance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 1356 of 2021
Saroj Kumar Biswal …. Petitioner
Mr. R.K. Mahanta, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Addl. Standing Counsel for Vigilance
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
03.12.2021
Order No.
1.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of cognizance passed by the court below at the current stage.
Whether the grounds to challenge the order of cognizance can be raised before the court below at the appropriate stage.
Saroj Kumar Biswal
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
