The Orissa High Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous petition. The bench held that questions regarding the sufficiency of evidence for Section 307 IPC are matters for the trial court to appreciate at the appropriate stage and refused to interfere.
Petitioner directed to raise grounds before the trial court by filing appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 133 of 2020
Asekmal Garadia
…. Petitioner
Mr. D.R. Bhokta, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
02.12.2021
Order No.
2.
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial court's cognizance of an offence under Section 307 IPC before the trial stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Asekmal Garadia
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
