The single-judge High Court refused to interfere with the impugned order of cognizance though it granted advance notice of bail consideration if the petitioner appeared within four weeks.
Quashing prayer rejected; bail to be considered sympathetically within four weeks if applied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1262 of 2016
Abani Sahu @ Abani Kumar …. Petitioner Sahu -versus…. State of Odisha & another Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
27.09.2021
arises out of a complaint case but could not bring to the notice of the Court, how the order of cognizance and the proceeding qua the Petitioner is bad.
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. However, if the Petitioner appears before the court in seisin over the matter and moves an application for bail within four weeks hence, the court in seisin over the matter shall consider
his prayer for bail sympathetically on the same day taking note of the fact that the matter arises out of a complaint case and the Petitioner was bona fidely prosecuting the litigation here and
ready and willing to cooperate with the trial.
application.
Judge
PKS
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to interfere with or quash the order of cognizance passed by the J.M.F.C.
Abani Sahu @ Abani Kumar
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
