The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Criminal Leave Petition (CRLA) filed by Surjya @ Surya Jena for grant of bail. The court noted the appellant had been acquitted by the trial court, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it accordingly.
The CRLA was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLA No.312 of 2020
…. Surjya @ Surya Jena Appellant
Mr. K.P.Dash, Advocate
Versus
1.Bijaya Ku. Naik 2.State of Odisha
…. Respondents
Mr. G.R.Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 28.10.2021
Order No.
1 of 2
// 2 //
rules.
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Bichi
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the CRLA for grant of bail should be allowed or dismissed when the underlying case has become infructuous due to acquittal.
Whether the High Court should dispose of the bail application as infructuous on the specific grounds of acquittal by the trial court.
Surjya @ Surya Jena
1. Bijaya Ku. Naik
State of Odisha
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
