This order dismisses the bail application as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the application due to completion of trial and conviction.
The bail application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 5433 of 2019
Dillip Makhal
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.S. Acharya, Advocate
Versus
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party
Mr. Sibani Shankar Pradhan, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No.
27.10.2021
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Sukanta
order is necessary to be passed on this submission as Mr. P.S. Acharya, learned counsel files a memo stating that they want to withdraw the bail application as the trial has been completed and has ended in conviction of the petitioner for which the bail application has become infructuous. The memo be kept on record.
.........................
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dillip Makhal
State of Orissa
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
