Second application for bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. rejected due to no change in circumstances. Direction given to trial court to expedite concluding the trial. Bail application dismissed.
Bail application dismissed; trial court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BLAPL NO.6728 OF 2020
This is the third second of the petitioner who is in custody connection with Jeypore Mahila P.S. Case No.05 of 2019 corresponding to C.T. Case No.34 of 2019 on the file of learned Asst. Sessions Judge, Jeypore for alleged commission of offence under section 376(2)(i)(n)/506 of the, in filing this application under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for his release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the earlier orders dated 23.12.2019 passed by this Court in BLAPL No.3256 of 2019 as well as the materials on record as placed, finding no such change in the circumstances; while being not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, it directed that the trial court would do well to take all such effective steps for conclusion of the trial as expeditiously as possible.
The BLAPL is accordingly dismissed.
……………………..
Narayan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to reconsider the bail prayer in light of no change in circumstances.
Whether to direct the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
State
Narayan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
