Mange @ Mangra Toppo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
A list case in a writ petition was called for, the petitioner failed to appear, the petitioner was directed to serve a brief, and the matter was listed for the future. No decision on merits was recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6473 of 2022
Pintu @ Tuna Sahu ……… Petitioner Mr. A.P.Bose, Adv. -versusState of Odisha& another ……… Opposite Parties Mr.A.Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
27.07.2022
Order No.
06. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is called upon to serve
a copy of the brief on the learned counsel for the State.
4. List this matter after four weeks.
( V.Narasingh )
Judge
Dhal
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pintu @ Tuna Sahu
- respondent
State of Odisha
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court