The petition challenging an order granting dates of cognizance was dismissed. The High Court declined to interfere but granted liberty to surrender and seek bail before the trial court.
Liberty granted to surrender before the trial court within two weeks and move for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.152 of 2021
Sudhir Kumar Tiyu @ Birua …. Petitioner
Mr. B.N.Mahapatra,
Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr.P.K.Maharaj,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
25.10.2021.
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. B.N.Mahapatra, learned counsel for the Petitioner,
and Mr. P.K.Maharaj, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the
State.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
AKB
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an order granting dates of cognizance against the petitioner and coaccused persons.
Sudhir Kumar Tiyu @ Birua
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
