Sk.Sabir v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dismissing the criminal B.L.A.P.L. for non-prosecution since the petitioner did not appear. The State Counsel noted the case involves Section 395 IPC and the petitioner's antecedents.
What did the court decide?
BLAPL dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.5933 of 2017
Sk.Sabir
…. Petitioner None
Versus
…. State of Odisha Opp. Party Mr.K.K.Nayak, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
26.10.2021
Order No.
06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called.
3. Mr. K.K.Nayak, learned Addl. Standing Counsel states
that this is a case under Section 395 of I.P.C. and that the
petitioner has a number of criminal antecedents.
4. Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner, the
BLAPL is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Bichi
1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sk.Sabir
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
Savitri Ratho
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court