The High Court of Orissa, acting in a hybrid mode on a constitutional petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., dismissed it on its merits holding it to be not maintainable based on the State's argument that the petitioners' physical presence was unnecessary per the charge sheet.
The petition was disposed of being held not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.3588 of 2021
Soudmini Mangaraj and others
…. Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
17.08.2021
any substance.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is maintainable given the absence of petitioner's required presence as per the charge sheet.
Soudmini Mangaraj and others
State of Odisha
S. PUJARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
